Here we are. Words are spreading that EU will push to enforce “censorship on words”. On 10 Sept., 2007 Reuters quoted a statement made by EU Commissioner Franco Frattini (Italian, sadly) who claimed:
Â«I do intend to carry out a clear exploring exercise with the private sector â€¦ on how it may be possible to use technology to prevent people from using or searching dangerous words like bomb, kill, genocide or terrorismÂ».
I can think of no better comment on that, but the one made by ALCEI:
Mr. Frattiniâ€™s suggestion is unacceptable, extremely dangerous and a serious threat against free speech. The â€œinternet-teaches-how-to-make bombsâ€ nonsense has been around since the netâ€™s early years. Along with â€œcopyright infringementsâ€ and misrepresented child protection urges â€“ as ALCEI denounced over ten years ago. The â€œinternet-bombâ€ issue has always been one of the excuses to invoke censorship and repression.
It is obvious â€“ and largely proven by facts â€“ that â€œfilteringâ€ or â€œprohibitingâ€ words or concepts is totally useless against criminals, while it turns into a weapon to kill freedom of information and expression. Preventing all citizens from discussing controversial topics doesnâ€™t reduce violence, murder or terrorism.
Peter Fleischer’s answer (Google’s Global Privacy Counsel) – as quoted by the Italian newspaper Repubblica.it – is not less concerning:
“There are a lot of reason why sombody might want to search on the Internet a word like “genocide”, for teaching purposes, say. According to Fleischer, the problem is to prevent some information to be released on line – such the bomb-making-how-to”. “But if a page is no the web” – he said – “Google must be allowed to search for it” (Translation from Italian by Andrea Monti. Please check the link above for the original text.)
It seems that Google might cope with censorship, as soon as the net is not affected.
Am I wrong?