The Datenschutzkonference (DSK) the body that gathers the German Data Protection Authorities has published a document on the relationship between the Recital 33 of the GDPR and its application to scientific research. And as often happens when this topics is involved, the results are useless, inconsistent and inapplicable. A more detailed analysis will allow us to understand the reason for such a harsh judgment on this document. Continue reading “The German DatenschutzKonferenze to issue non viable GDPR compliance hints for medical research”
Since people have been anesthetized to the “privacy threats” that everybody and his cousin is seeing around, now “race” is the new trend to bash profiling, surveillance and whatever else the “human rightsÂ warriors” pick as “enemy-of-the-day”.
This article from wired.com – that matches the same “philosophy” of this one published by Wired.it about the racism of algorithm – hints atÂ a new trend to give trollers something to (keyboard) fight for: forget privacy, RACE is the buzzword-to-go to show righteous indignation!
Algorithms are bad for RACE, Artificial Intelligence is bad for RACE, face recognition is a RACE thing… computer and RACE, smartphone and RACE, videogames and RACE, RACE, RACE,Â RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE, RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE,Â RACE.
p.s. Sorry Monty Python.
Protecting Personal Information is a book I co-authored with Prof. Raymond Wacks. As the sub-title says, this is an attempt to reconsider the right to privacy from a different perspective. Continue reading “Protecting Personal Information”
In an interview published by the Italian newspaper “La Stampa” on Oct. 31, 2017 the Italian Data Protection Commissioner Soro stated that:
“If it is true that a profit can be gained from the research on human biological material, is it true – too – that there is no such thing as biobank ownership, but only the right to research the available samples. 1“
- “Se Ã¨ vero che si possono ottenere profÃ¬tti dalle ricerche sul materiale biologico degli esseri umani, Ã¨ altrettanto vero non esiste la proprietÃ di una biobanca, ma solo il diritto a fare studi sui campioni disponibili” – English translation by Andrea Monti. ↩
In the last couple of days, commenting a Linkedin post about Article 29’s (the future European Data Protection Supervisor) opinions, I’ve been involved in an interesting thread that can be summarized as “Authority vs. Legal Interpretation”. Continue reading “Enforcing the GDPR: Authority vs Legal Interpretation”